Analysis Of The Tartar Table And The Bondage Suit As Great Examples Of Postmodernism

Table of Contents

Circumstances

Literature Review

In conclusion

Postmodernism is a period in which architecture and design started to depart from the traditional designs that had been used before. Design became more subjective and varied. Postmodernism is often referred to as design. Ettore SOTTSASS created the Tartar Table back in 1985. Vivienne Eastwood, Malcolm McLaren and Malcolm McLaren designed the Bondage Suit. Both are great examples of Postmodernism but the Tartar Table is far more accurate.

Postmodernism is a period in which art was broken away and interterpentational pieces were expressed. This can be seen in many ways. Postmodernism can be seen as a more distinctive style. This allows one to compare the two styles and determine which is the most representative of the Postmodern style. Introduction The Tartar Table was created by Ettore Sottsass in 1985. This piece was created for Memphis Milano. This piece is made out of reconstituted wooden veneer, plastic laminar, lacquer, plywood and lacquer. This console table is a unique and creative take on the standard console table. It was made in Postmodern style. The black base supports a rectangular block in tan that meets a support rail. It is partially supported by a second, shorter black base. To the right is a second support in white that connects with the upper base. The last support, which is marble-patterned, sits on a small red block. It connects to both the upper and lower bases. The black bottom base surrounds the entire block and the black top base covers the top and bottom. There are diagonal lines running around the edges. A second rectangular block lies on top, which is the same as the first, but is slightly larger, lighter, and more red. There is a wooden patterned, thin piece of wood between the sides supports. It connects with both bases. The Bondage Suit was designed by Vivienne Eastwood in the late 1970s (1976-1980). This suit was made from metal and cotton. Vivienne and Malcolm McLaren collaborated to create the suit. The original pants were standard army pant from that time. McLaren saw the pants and made them the same color as British railway clerks’ waistcoats. It was a shiny black satin. It was a black t-shirt with a collar, pockets and zip up. The trench coat has a button-up shirt underneath with light, dull colors. The black pants have a full length skirt and are attached by chains. Mclaren also added bondage-straps between the knees.

Context: It is important that you consider how these objects relate to Postmodernism when comparing them. Postmodernism was known for its ability to blur the lines between high and lower art, in particular by incorporating elements from popular culture . Vivienne’s Bondage Suit is a wonderful example of combining the ordinary with the “punk style” of the time. This is also evident in Ettore’s use of color and an erratic design to transform a console table into something unique, vibrant, and representative of its time. History of Modern Design by David Raizman discusses the laminated surfaces and how they are juxtaposed. He also relates it with other artwork. He discusses “conflicting, overlap interpretations that aren’t atypical Postmodern forms …” These statements emphasize the Postmodernism the Tartar Table has. His brightly laminated surfaces, and his use of juxtapositions to reinforce the Postmodern style. Raizman addresses Vivienne’s work, describing it, along with others, as “Clothing invoked underground ponography and bondage and tight fitting elastic and shiny material, and an unbridled expression intended to celebrate diversity and test boundaries of propriety.” This quote is a great example of Postmodernism’s freedom of expression.

Postmodernism’s other characteristic is the “

It is the idea that an artwork of art has one intrinsic meaning. This is related to the Tartar Table. It supports the Postmodern style’s relationship to the Tartar Table. The piece has no apparent meaning, which allows for interpretation. Interpretations can be made by the way the pieces are arranged, the colors they have, or by the use of negative and positive space. This characteristic can also be applied to the Bondage Suit. Depending on how it is viewed and by whom, this suit can have a different meaning. The Tartar Table and Bondage Suit can be compared to determine which is the best representation of Postmodernism.

Postmodern design is reflected in the way that the juxtaposition is used, not just in the color choice but also in the placement of the pieces. Although the console table’s function is not lost, the design of this piece makes the ordinary object extraordinary and unordinary. The Bondage Suit has a unique design, but the function is not limited by it.

Review of Literature David Raizman, a scholar, published The History of Modern Design. I used this book to help me create my paper. Raizmans writing style was very clear and easy-to-follow. It helped me understand modern design. I recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more. It is informative and easy to understand. Colleen A. Adours, Ashbee, Dawn of the Modern Movement of Design in the Age of Jack the Ripper!, was another valuable source of information when creating this paper. I was able to use the scholars paper to help me understand how to make a comparative paper. The layout was simple to understand because the paper was clearly laid out and easy-to-follow.

Sarah Jenkins’ paper “Postmodern Art”, was an excellent source of information that helped me understand Postmodern Art. Her paper was well organized. The layout of her paper is easy to understand and provides a valuable resource for anyone looking to find out more about Postmodernism. Her writing style and explanations of concepts were clear and easy-to-follow.

Postmodernism was the time when design and art began to depart from the traditional “good art” style. Vivienne’s and Ettores’ pieces show the Postmodern style better. Ettores Tartar Table, however, is a far superior representation. The table is a departure from traditional design, but it does not compromise the object’s function. This piece supports and interprets the Postmodern ideas. This allowed me to better understand Postmodern design.